Paper detail

Detectability of labeled weighted automata over monoids

In this paper, we for the first time obtain characterization of four fundamental notions of detectability for general labeled weighted automata over monoids (denoted by $\mathcal{A}^{\mathfrak{M}}$ for short), where the four notions are strong (periodic) detectability (SD and SPD) and weak (periodic) detectability (WD and WPD). Firstly, we formulate the notions of concurrent composition, observer, and detector for $\mathcal{A}^{\mathfrak{M}}$. Secondly, we use the concurrent composition to give an equivalent condition for SD, use the detector to give an equivalent condition for SPD, and use the observer to give equivalent conditions for WD and WPD, all for general $\mathcal{A}^{\mathfrak{M}}$ without any assumption. Thirdly, we prove that for a labeled weighted automaton over monoid $(\mathbb{Q}^k,+)$ (denoted by $\mathcal{A}^{\mathbb{Q}^k}$), its concurrent composition, observer, and detector can be computed in NP, $2$-EXPTIME, and $2$-EXPTIME, respectively, by developing novel connections between $\mathcal{A}^{\mathbb{Q}^k}$ and the NP-complete exact path length problem (proved by [Nykänen and Ukkonen, 2002]) and a subclass of Presburger arithmetic. As a result, we prove that for $\mathcal{A}^{\mathbb{Q}^k}$, SD can be verified in coNP, while SPD, WD, and WPD can be verified in $2$-EXPTIME. Finally, we prove that the problems of verifying SD and SPD of deterministic, deadlock-free, and divergence-free $\mathcal{A}^{\mathbb{N}}$ over monoid $(\mathbb{N},+)$ are both coNP-hard. The developed original methods will provide foundations for characterizing other fundamental properties (e.g., diagnosability, opacity) for $\mathcal{A}^{\mathfrak{M}}$. We also initially explore detectability in labeled timed automata, and prove that the SD verification problem is PSPACE-complete, while WD and WPD are undecidable.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.