BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Kuize Zhang

Kuize Zhang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Formal Languages and Automata Theorymath.OCCryptography and Securityeess.SYProgramming LanguagesSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

[Draft] High-order estimation-based properties and high-order observers for labeled finite-state automata

In this paper, we consider labeled finite-state automata (LFSAs), extend some state estimation-based properties from a single agent to a finite ordered set of agents. We also extend the notion of observer to \emph{high-order observer} using our \emph{concurrent composition}. As a result, a general framework for characterizing high-order estimation-based properties is built, in which each agent infers its preceding agent's estimation via all agents in front. The high-order observer plays the role of a basic tool to verify such properties. In more detail, in our general framework, the system's structure is publicly known to all agents $A_1,\dots,A_n$; each agent $A_i$ has its own observable event set $E_i$, and additionally knows all its preceding agents' observable events but can only observe its own observable events. The intuitive meaning of our high-order observer is to characterize what agent $A_n$ knows about what $A_{n-1}$ knows about \dots what $A_2$ knows about $A_1$'s state estimate of the system. This general framework can be regarded as an automata representation of dynamic epistemic logic. Compared with the classical representation of dynamic epistemic logic based on fragments of logic, our representation has advantages in property verification and flexibly changing agents to enforce properties. As case studies, this general framework applies to basic properties such as current-state opacity, strong current-state opacity, regular-language-based opacity, critical observability, high-order opacity, etc. Special cases for which verification can be done more efficiently are also discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Detectability of labeled weighted automata over monoids

In this paper, we for the first time obtain characterization of four fundamental notions of detectability for general labeled weighted automata over monoids (denoted by $\mathcal{A}^{\mathfrak{M}}$ for short), where the four notions are strong (periodic) detectability (SD and SPD) and weak (periodic) detectability (WD and WPD). Firstly, we formulate the notions of concurrent composition, observer, and detector for $\mathcal{A}^{\mathfrak{M}}$. Secondly, we use the concurrent composition to give an equivalent condition for SD, use the detector to give an equivalent condition for SPD, and use the observer to give equivalent conditions for WD and WPD, all for general $\mathcal{A}^{\mathfrak{M}}$ without any assumption. Thirdly, we prove that for a labeled weighted automaton over monoid $(\mathbb{Q}^k,+)$ (denoted by $\mathcal{A}^{\mathbb{Q}^k}$), its concurrent composition, observer, and detector can be computed in NP, $2$-EXPTIME, and $2$-EXPTIME, respectively, by developing novel connections between $\mathcal{A}^{\mathbb{Q}^k}$ and the NP-complete exact path length problem (proved by [Nykänen and Ukkonen, 2002]) and a subclass of Presburger arithmetic. As a result, we prove that for $\mathcal{A}^{\mathbb{Q}^k}$, SD can be verified in coNP, while SPD, WD, and WPD can be verified in $2$-EXPTIME. Finally, we prove that the problems of verifying SD and SPD of deterministic, deadlock-free, and divergence-free $\mathcal{A}^{\mathbb{N}}$ over monoid $(\mathbb{N},+)$ are both coNP-hard. The developed original methods will provide foundations for characterizing other fundamental properties (e.g., diagnosability, opacity) for $\mathcal{A}^{\mathfrak{M}}$. We also initially explore detectability in labeled timed automata, and prove that the SD verification problem is PSPACE-complete, while WD and WPD are undecidable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Synthesis for observability of logical control networks

Finite-state systems have applications in systems biology, formal verification and synthesis of infinite-state (hybrid) systems, etc. As deterministic finite-state systems, logical control networks (LCNs) consist of a finite number of nodes which can be in a finite number of states and update their states. In this paper, we investigate the synthesis problem for observability of LCNs based on state feedback with exogenous input by using the semitensor product proposed by Daizhan Cheng and the notion of observability graph (previously called weighted pair graph) proposed by us. We show that state feedback with exogenous input can either enforce or weaken observability of an LCN. We prove that for an LCN $Σ$ and another closed-loop LCN $Σ_{\mathcal{C}}$ obtained by feeding a state-feedback controller $\mathcal{C}$ with exogenous input into $Σ$, (1) if $Σ$ is observable, then $Σ_{\mathcal{C}}$ can be either observable or not; (2) if $Σ$ is not observable, $Σ_{\mathcal{C}}$ can also be observable or not. We also prove that if an unobservable LCN can be made observable by state feedback with exogenous input, then it can also be made observable by state feedback (without exogenous input, equivalent to state feedback with constant input). Furthermore, we give an upper bound on the number of state-feedback controllers that are needed to be tested in order to verify whether an unobservable LCN can be made observable by state feedback, and based on the procedure of obtaining the upper bound, we design an observability synthesis algorithm, by additionally combining the ideas of a greedy algorithm and dynamic programming. These results open the study of observability synthesis in LCNs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Verification of Strong K-Step Opacity for Discrete-Event Systems

In this paper, we revisit the verification of strong K-step opacity (K-SSO) for partially-observed discrete-event systems modeled as nondeterministic finite-state automata. As a stronger version of the standard K-step opacity, K-SSO requires that an intruder cannot make sure whether or not a secret state has been visited within the last K observable steps. To efficiently verify K-SSO, we propose a new concurrent-composition structure, which is a variant of our previously- proposed one. Based on this new structure, we design an algorithm for deciding K-SSO and prove that the proposed algorithm not only reduces the time complexity of the existing algorithms, but also does not depend on the value of K. Furthermore, a new upper bound on the value of K in K-SSO is derived, which also reduces the existing upper bound on K in the literature. Finally, we illustrate the proposed algorithm by a simple example.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A unified method to decentralized state inference and fault diagnosis/prediction of discrete-event systems

The state inference problem and fault diagnosis/prediction problem are fundamental topics in many areas. In this paper, we consider discrete-event systems (DESs) modeled by finite-state automata (FSAs). There exist results for decentralized versions of the latter problem but there is almost no result for a decentralized version of the former problem. We propose a decentralized version of strong detectability called co-detectability which implies that once a system satisfies this property, for each generated infinite-length event sequence, at least one local observer can determine the current and subsequent states after a common observation time delay. We prove that the problem of verifying co-detectability of FSAs is coNP-hard. Moreover, we use a unified concurrent-composition method to give PSPACE verification algorithms for co-detectability, co-diagnosability, and co-predictability of FSAs, without any assumption or modifying the FSAs under consideration, where co-diagnosability is firstly studied by [Debouk & Lafortune & Teneketzis 2000], while co-predictability is firstly studied by [Kumar \& Takai 2010]. By our proposed unified method, one can see that in order to verify co-detectability, more technical difficulties will be met compared to verifying the other two properties, because in co-detectability, generated outputs are counted, but in the latter two properties, only occurrences of events are counted. For example, when one output was generated, any number of unobservable events could have occurred. The PSPACE-hardness of verifying co-diagnosability is already known in the literature. In this paper, we prove the PSPACE-hardness of verifying co-predictability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access