Paper detail

Detect and remove watermark in deep neural networks via generative adversarial networks

Deep neural networks (DNN) have achieved remarkable performance in various fields. However, training a DNN model from scratch requires a lot of computing resources and training data. It is difficult for most individual users to obtain such computing resources and training data. Model copyright infringement is an emerging problem in recent years. For instance, pre-trained models may be stolen or abuse by illegal users without the authorization of the model owner. Recently, many works on protecting the intellectual property of DNN models have been proposed. In these works, embedding watermarks into DNN based on backdoor is one of the widely used methods. However, when the DNN model is stolen, the backdoor-based watermark may face the risk of being detected and removed by an adversary. In this paper, we propose a scheme to detect and remove watermark in deep neural networks via generative adversarial networks (GAN). We demonstrate that the backdoor-based DNN watermarks are vulnerable to the proposed GAN-based watermark removal attack. The proposed attack method includes two phases. In the first phase, we use the GAN and few clean images to detect and reverse the watermark in the DNN model. In the second phase, we fine-tune the watermarked DNN based on the reversed backdoor images. Experimental evaluations on the MNIST and CIFAR10 datasets demonstrate that, the proposed method can effectively remove about 98% of the watermark in DNN models, as the watermark retention rate reduces from 100% to less than 2% after applying the proposed attack. In the meantime, the proposed attack hardly affects the model's performance. The test accuracy of the watermarked DNN on the MNIST and the CIFAR10 datasets drops by less than 1% and 3%, respectively.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.