Paper detail

Destabilization of U(1) Dirac spin-liquids on two dimensional non-bipartite lattices by quenched disorder

The stability of the Dirac spin-liquid on two-dimensional lattices has long been debated. It was recently demonstrated [Nature Commun. 10, 4254 (2019) and Phys. Rev. B 93, 144411 (2016)] that the staggered $π$-flux Dirac spin-liquid phase on the non-bipartite triangular lattice may be stable in the clean limit. However, quenched disorder plays a crucial role in determining whether such a phase is experimentally viable. For SU(2) spin systems, the effective zero-temperature, low-energy description of Dirac spin-liquids in $(2+1)$ dimensions is given by the compact quantum electrodynamics ($\rm cQED_{2+1}$) which admits monopoles. It is already known that generic quenched random perturbations to the non-compact version of $\rm QED_{2+1}$ (where monopoles are absent) lead to strong-coupling instabilities. In this paper we study $\rm cQED_{2+1}$ in the presence of a class of time-reversal invariant quenched disorder perturbations. We show that in this model, random non-Abelian vector potentials make the symmetry-allowed monopole operators more relevant. The disorder-induced underscreening of monopoles, thus, generically makes the gapless spin-liquid phase fragile.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.