Paper detail

Designing and using prior knowledge for phase retrieval

In this work we develop an algorithm for signal reconstruction from the magnitude of its Fourier transform in a situation where some (non-zero) parts of the sought signal are known. Although our method does not assume that the known part comprises the boundary of the sought signal, this is often the case in microscopy: a specimen is placed inside a known mask, which can be thought of as a known light source that surrounds the unknown signal. Therefore, in the past, several algorithms were suggested that solve the phase retrieval problem assuming known boundary values. Unlike our method, these methods do rely on the fact that the known part is on the boundary. Besides the reconstruction method we give an explanation of the phenomena observed in previous work: the reconstruction is much faster when there is more energy concentrated in the known part. Quite surprisingly, this can be explained using our previous results on phase retrieval with approximately known Fourier phase.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.