Paper detail

Design Optimization of a Small-animal SPECT System Using LGSO Continuous Crystal and a Micro Parallel-hole Collimator

The aim of this study was to optimize the design of a monolithic LGSO scintillation crystal and micro parallel-hole collimator for the development of a small-animal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) system with compact size, low-cost and reasonable performance through Monte Carlo simulation. L0.9GSO crystals with surface area of 50 mm X 50 mm were investigated for the design optimization. The intrinsic detection efficiency, intrinsic spatial resolution, and intrinsic energy resolution of crystals were estimated for different crystal thicknesses and photon energies (using I-125 and Tc-99m sources). Two kinds of surface treatments (providing polished and rough surfaces) were compared by optical photon simulation. The standard deviation of the angle between a micro-facet and the mean surface was set to 0.1 and 6.0 for polished and rough surfaces, respectively. For comparison, the intrinsic performance of NaI(Tl) was also investigated. A multi-photomultiplier tube was designed with 16 X 16 anode pixels having size of 2.8 mm X 2.8 mm and pitch of 3.04 mm, and a 1.5 mm thickness glass window. The length of the micro collimator was also optimized. Finally, the performance of the SPECT system was assessed and an ultra-micro hot spot phantom image was obtained in simulation. The 1-mm-thick LGSO was sufficient to detect most incident photons from I-125 but a thickness of 3 mm was required for Tc-99m imaging. Polished crystal yielded better intrinsic spatial resolution (~540 μm) and lower light output than rough crystal. Energy resolutions of I-125 and Tc-99m were ~36.9% and ~19.1%. With the optimized collimator length, spatial resolution of ~1 mm and sensitivity of ~100 cps/MBq were achieved with a four-head SPECT system. A hot rod with a diameter of 1.0 mm was resolved in the SPECT image of ultra-micro hot spot phantom.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.