Paper detail

Design of Low Thrust Controlled Maneuvers to Chase and De-orbit the Space Debris

Over the several decades, the space debris at LEO has grown rapidly which had caused a serious threat to the operating satellite in an orbit. To avoid the risk of collision and protect the LEO environment, the space robotics ADR concept has been continuously developed for over a decade to chase, capture, and deorbit space debris. This paper presents the designed small satellite with dual robotic manipulators. The small satellite is designed based on CubeSat standards, which uses commercially available products in the market. In this paper, an approach is detailed for designing the controlled chase and deorbit maneuver for a small satellite equipped with an RCS thruster. The maneuvers are comprised of two phases, a. bringing the chaser satellite to the debris orbit and accelerating it to close proximity of 1m to the debris object by using the low thrust RCS thruster, and b. Once captured, controlled deorbiting it to 250 km of altitude. A Hohmann transfer concept is used to move our chaser satellite from the lower orbit to the debris orbit by two impulsive burns. A number of the scenarios are simulated, where one or more orbital elements are adjusted. For more than one orbital elements adjustment, the DAG law and the Q law are utilized. These laws synthesize the three direction thrusts to the single thrust force for the controlled maneuver. The $Δ$V requirement at each maneuver is determined by using the performance parameters of the RCS thruster intended for a small satellite. The results show that, for long term simulation of a chaser satellite maneuver to debris object, an optimum DAG law is most suitable than the Q law, as it can handle the singularity behavior of the orbital elements caused due by adjustment of one or more elements more efficiently.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.