Paper detail

Design of an electrostatic balance mechanism to measure optical power of 100 kW

A new instrument is required to accommodate the need for increased portability and accuracy in laser power measurement above 100 W. Reflection and absorption of laser light provide a measurable force from photon momentum exchange that is directly proportional to laser power, which can be measured with an electrostatic balance traceable to the SI. We aim for a relative uncertainty of $10^{-3}$ with coverage factor $k=2$. For this purpose, we have designed a monolithic parallelogram 4-bar linkage incorporating elastic circular notch flexure hinges. The design is optimized to address the main factors driving force measurement uncertainty from the balance mechanism: corner loading errors, balance stiffness, stress in the flexure hinges, sensitivity to vibration, and sensitivity to thermal gradients. Parasitic rotations in the free end of the 4-bar linkage during arcuate motion are constrained by machining tolerances. An analytical model shows this affects the force measurement less than 0.01 percent. Incorporating an inverted pendulum reduces the stiffness of the system without unduly increasing tilt sensitivity. Finite element modeling of the flexures is used to determine the hinge orientation that minimizes stress which is therefore expected to minimize hysteresis. Thermal effects are mitigated using an external enclosure to minimize temperature gradients, although a quantitative analysis of this effect is not carried out. These analyses show the optimized mechanism is expected to contribute less than $10^{-3}$ relative uncertainty in the final laser power measurement.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.