Paper detail

Design Evaluation of Serial and Parallel sub-mK Continuous Nuclear Demagnetization Refrigerators

We present the evaluation of two different design configurations of a two-stage PrNi$_5$ continuous nuclear demagnetization refrigerator. Serial and parallel configurations of the two stages are considered, with emphasis on the attainable cooling power at sub-mK temperatures and the impact of the design choices on the operation of the refrigerator. Numerical simulations of heat transfer in the setup are used to evaluate the performance of the refrigerator as well as the technological requirements for the essential thermal links. In accord with similar findings for adiabatic demagnetization refrigerators [Shirron, \emph{Cryogenics} \textbf{62}, 2014], our simulations show that the performance of both configurations improves as the thermal links improve, and that the parallel configuration yields a higher cooling power than the series design for a given thermal link resistance and sample temperature.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.