Paper detail

Design and validation of zero-slack separable manipulator for Intracardiac Echocardiography

Clinicians require substantial training and experience to become comfortable with steering Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) catheter to localize and measure the area of treatment to watch for complications while device catheters are deployed in another access. Thus, it is reasonable that a robotic-assist system to hold and actively manipulate the ICE catheter could ease the workload of the physician. Existing commercially-available robotic systems and research prototypes all use existing commercially available ICE catheters based on multiple tendon-sheath mechanism (TSM). To motorize the existing TSM-based ICE catheter, the actuators interface with the outer handle knobs to manipulate four internal tendons. However, in practice, the actuators are located at a sterile, safe place far away from the ICE handle. Thus, to interface with knobs, there exist multiple coupled gear structures between two, leading to a highly nonlinear behavior (e.g. various slack, elasticity) alongside hysteresis phenomena in TSM. Since ICE catheters are designed for single use, the expensive actuators need to be located in a safe place so as to be reusable. Moreover, these actuators should interface as directly as possible with the tendons for accurate tip controls. In this paper, we introduce a separable ICE catheter robot with four tendon actuation: one part reusable and another disposable. Moreover, we propose a practical model and calibration method for our proposed mechanism so that four tendons are actuated simultaneously allowing for precise tip control and mitigating issues with conventional devices such as dead-zone and hysteresis with simple linear compensation. We consider an open-loop controller since many available ICE catheters are used without position-tracking sensors at the tip due to costs and single use

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.