Paper detail

Design and implementation of self-adaptable parallel algorithms for scientific computing on highly heterogeneous HPC platforms

Traditional heterogeneous parallel algorithms, designed for heterogeneous clusters of workstations, are based on the assumption that the absolute speed of the processors does not depend on the size of the computational task. This assumption proved inaccurate for modern and perspective highly heterogeneous HPC platforms. New class of algorithms based on the functional performance model (FPM), representing the speed of the processor by a function of problem size, has been recently proposed. These algorithms cannot be however employed in self-adaptable applications because of very high cost of construction of the functional performance model. The paper presents a new class of parallel algorithms for highly heterogeneous HPC platforms. Like traditional FPM-based algorithms, these algorithms assume that the speed of the processors is characterized by speed functions rather than speed constants. Unlike the traditional algorithms, they do not assume the speed functions to be given. Instead, they estimate the speed functions of the processors for different problem sizes during their execution. These algorithms do not construct the full speed function for each processor but rather build and use their partial estimates sufficient for optimal distribution of computations with a given accuracy. The low execution cost of distribution of computations between heterogeneous processors in these algorithms make them suitable for employment in self-adaptable applications. Experiments with parallel matrix multiplication applications based on this approach are performed on local and global heterogeneous computational clusters. The results show that the execution time of optimal matrix distribution between processors is significantly less, by orders of magnitude, than the total execution time of the optimized application.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.