Paper detail

Design admissibility and de la Garza phenomenon in multi-factor experiments

The determination of an optimal design for a given regression problem is an intricate optimization problem, especially for models with multivariate predictors. Design admissibility and invariance are main tools to reduce the complexity of the optimization problem and have been successfully applied for models with univariate predictors. In particular several authors have developed sufficient conditions for the existence of saturated designs in univariate models, where the number of support points of the optimal design equals the number of parameters. These results generalize the celebrated de la Garza phenomenon (de la Garza, 1954) which states that for a polynomial regression model of degree $p-1$ any optimal design can be based on at most $p$ points. This paper provides - for the first time - extensions of these results for models with a multivariate predictor. In particular we study a geometric characterization of the support points of an optimal design to provide sufficient conditions for the occurrence of the de la Garza phenomenon in models with multivariate predictors and characterize properties of admissible designs in terms of admissibility of designs in conditional univariate regression models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.