Paper detail

Descriptive Proximities I: Properties and interplay between classical proximities and overlap

The theory of descriptive nearness is usually adopted when dealing with sets that share some common properties even when the sets are not spatially close, i.e., the sets have no members in common. Set description results from the use of probe functions to define feature vectors that describe a set and the nearness of sets is given by their proximities. A probe on a non-empty set $X$ is a real-valued function $Φ: X \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$, where $Φ(x)= (ϕ_1(x),.., ϕ_n(x))$. We establish a connection between relations on an object space $X$ and relations on the feature space $Φ(X).$ Having as starting point the Peters proximity, two sets are \emph{descriptively near}, if and only if their descriptions intersect. In this paper, we construct a theoretical approach to a more visual form of proximity, namely, descriptive proximity, which has a broad spectrum of applications. We organize descriptive proximities on two different levels: weaker or stronger than the Peters proximity. We analyze the properties and interplay between descriptions on one side and classical proximities and overlap relations on the other side.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.