Researcher profile

C. Guadagni

C. Guadagni contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Descriptive Proximities I: Properties and interplay between classical proximities and overlap

The theory of descriptive nearness is usually adopted when dealing with sets that share some common properties even when the sets are not spatially close, i.e., the sets have no members in common. Set description results from the use of probe functions to define feature vectors that describe a set and the nearness of sets is given by their proximities. A probe on a non-empty set $X$ is a real-valued function $Φ: X \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$, where $Φ(x)= (ϕ_1(x),.., ϕ_n(x))$. We establish a connection between relations on an object space $X$ and relations on the feature space $Φ(X).$ Having as starting point the Peters proximity, two sets are \emph{descriptively near}, if and only if their descriptions intersect. In this paper, we construct a theoretical approach to a more visual form of proximity, namely, descriptive proximity, which has a broad spectrum of applications. We organize descriptive proximities on two different levels: weaker or stronger than the Peters proximity. We analyze the properties and interplay between descriptions on one side and classical proximities and overlap relations on the other side.

preprint2015arXiv

Strongly Hit and Far Miss Hypertopology and Hit and Strongly Far Miss Hypertopology

This article introduces the {\it strongly hit and far-miss as well as hit and strongly far miss hypertopologies on $\textrm{CL}(X)$ associated with} ${\mathscr{B}}$, a nonempty family of subsets on the topological space $X$. They result from the strong farness and strong nearness proximities. The main results in this paper stem from the Hausdorffness of $(\textrm{CL}(X), τ_{\doublevee, \mathscr{B}})$ and $(\textrm{RCL}(X), τ^\doublewedge_\mathscr{B} ) $, where $\textrm{RCL}(X)$ is the space of regular closed subsets of $X$. To obtain the results, special local families are introduced.

preprint2015arXiv

Strongly Proximal Continuity \& Strong Connectedness

This article introduces strongly proximal continuous (s.p.c.) functions, strong proximal equivalence (s.p.e.) and strong connectedness. A main result is that if topological spaces $X,Y$ are endowed with compatible strong proximities and $f:X\longrightarrow Y$ is a bijective s.p.e., then its extension on the hyperspaces $\CL(X)$ and $\CL(Y)$, endowed with the related strongly hit and miss hypertopologies, is a homeomorphism. For a topological space endowed with a strongly near proximity, strongly proximal connectedness implies connectedness but not conversely. Conditions required for strongly proximal connectedness are given. Applications of s.p.c. and strongly proximal connectedness are given in terms of strongly proximal descriptive proximity.