Paper detail

Depth resolved pencil beam radiography using AI -- a proof of principle study

AIMS: Clinical radiographic imaging is seated upon the principle of differential keV photon transmission through an object. At clinical x-ray energies the scattering of photons causes signal noise and is utilized solely for transmission measurements. However, scatter - particularly Compton scatter, is characterizable. In this work we hypothesized that modern radiation sources and detectors paired with deep learning techniques can use scattered photon information constructively to resolve superimposed attenuators in planar x-ray imaging. METHODS: We simulated a monoenergetic x-ray imaging system consisting of a pencil beam x-ray source directed at an imaging target positioned in front of a high spatial- and energy-resolution detector array. The signal was analyzed by a convolutional neural network, and a description of scattering material along the axis of the beam was derived. The system was virtually designed/tested using Monte Carlo processing of simple phantoms consisting of 10 pseudo-randomly stacked air/bone/water materials, and the network was trained by solving a classification problem. RESULTS: The average accuracy of the material identification along the beam was 0.91 +- 0.01, with slightly higher accuracy towards the entrance/exit peripheral surfaces of the object. The average sensitivity and specificity was 0.91 and 0.95, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our work provides proof of principle that deep learning techniques can be used to analyze scattered photon patterns which can constructively contribute to the information content in radiography, here used to infer depth information in a traditional 2D planar setup. This principle, and our results, demonstrate that the information in Compton scattered photons may provide a basis for further development. The ability to scale performance to the clinic remains unexplored and requires further study.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.