Paper detail

Deprojection of X-ray data in galaxy clusters: confronting simulations with observations

Numerical simulations with varying realism indicate an emergent principle -- multiphase condensation and large cavity power occur when the ratio of the cooling time to the free-fall time ($t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$) falls below a threshold value close to 10. Observations indeed show cool-core signatures when this ratio falls below 20-30, but the prevalence of cores with $t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$ ratio below 10 is rare as compared to simulations. In X-ray observations, we obtain projected spectra from which we have to infer radial gas density and temperature profiles. Using idealized models of X-ray cavities and multiphase gas in the core and 3-D hydro jet-ICM simulations, we quantify the biases introduced by deprojection based on the assumption of spherical symmetry in determining $t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$. We show that while the used methods are able to recover the $t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$ ratio for relaxed clusters, they have an uncertainty of a factor of $2-3$ in systems containing large cavities ($\gtrsim 20$ kpc). We also show that the mass estimates from these methods, in the absence of X-ray spectra close to the virial radius, suffer from a degeneracy between the virial mass ($M_{200}$) and the concentration parameter ($c$) in the form of $M_{200} c^2 \approx$ constant. Additionally, lack of soft-X-ray ($\lesssim 0.5$ keV) coverage and poor spatial resolution make us overestimate min($t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$) by a factor of few in clusters with min($t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$) $\lesssim 5$. This bias can largely explain the lack of cool-core clusters with min($t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$) $\lesssim 5$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.