Source author record

Kartick C Sarkar

Kartick C Sarkar appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Deprojection of X-ray data in galaxy clusters: confronting simulations with observations

Numerical simulations with varying realism indicate an emergent principle -- multiphase condensation and large cavity power occur when the ratio of the cooling time to the free-fall time ($t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$) falls below a threshold value close to 10. Observations indeed show cool-core signatures when this ratio falls below 20-30, but the prevalence of cores with $t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$ ratio below 10 is rare as compared to simulations. In X-ray observations, we obtain projected spectra from which we have to infer radial gas density and temperature profiles. Using idealized models of X-ray cavities and multiphase gas in the core and 3-D hydro jet-ICM simulations, we quantify the biases introduced by deprojection based on the assumption of spherical symmetry in determining $t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$. We show that while the used methods are able to recover the $t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$ ratio for relaxed clusters, they have an uncertainty of a factor of $2-3$ in systems containing large cavities ($\gtrsim 20$ kpc). We also show that the mass estimates from these methods, in the absence of X-ray spectra close to the virial radius, suffer from a degeneracy between the virial mass ($M_{200}$) and the concentration parameter ($c$) in the form of $M_{200} c^2 \approx$ constant. Additionally, lack of soft-X-ray ($\lesssim 0.5$ keV) coverage and poor spatial resolution make us overestimate min($t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$) by a factor of few in clusters with min($t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$) $\lesssim 5$. This bias can largely explain the lack of cool-core clusters with min($t_{\rm cool}/t_{\rm ff}$) $\lesssim 5$.