Paper detail

Density functional theory analysis of the interplay between Jahn-Teller instability, uniaxial magnetism, spin arrangement, metal-metal interaction and spin-orbit coupling in Ca3CoMO6 (M = Co, Rh, Ir)

In the isostructural oxides Ca3CoMO6 (M = Co, Rh, Ir), the CoMO6 chains made up of face-sharing CoO6 trigonal prisms and MO6 octahedra are separated by Ca atoms. We analyzed the magnetic and electronic properties of these oxides on the basis of density functional theory calculations including on-site repulsion and spin-orbit coupling, and examined the essential one-electron pictures hidden behind results of these calculations. Our analysis reveals an intimate interplay between Jahn-Teller instability, uniaxial magnetism, spin arrangement, metal-metal interaction, and spin-orbit coupling in governing the magnetic and electronic properties of these oxides. These oxides undergo a Jahn-Teller distortion but their distortions are weak, so that their trigonal-prism Con+ (n = 2, 3) ions still give rise to strong easy-axis anisotropy along the chain direction. As for the d-state split pattern of these ions, the electronic and magnetic properties of Ca3CoMO6 (M = Co, Rh, Ir) are consistent with d0 < (d2, d-2) < (d1, d-1), but not with (d2, d-2) < d0 < (d1, d-1). The trigonal-prism Co3+ ion in Ca3Co2O6 has the L = 2 configuration (d0)1(d2, d-2)3(d1, d-1)2 because of the metal-metal interaction between adjacent Co3+ ions in each Co2O6 chain, which is mediated by their z2 orbitals, and the spin-orbit coupling of the trigonal-prism Co3+ ion. The spins in each CoMO6 chain of Ca3CoMO6 prefer the ferromagnetic arrangement for M = Co and Rh, but the antiferromagnetic arrangement for M = Ir. The octahedral M4+ ion of Ca3CoMO6 has the (1a)1(1e)4 configuration for M = Rh but the (1a)2(1e)3 configuration for M = Ir, which arises from the difference in the spin-orbit coupling of the M4+ ions and the Co...M metal-metal interactions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.