Paper detail

Density Evolution in the Degree-correlated Stochastic Block Model

There is a recent surge of interest in identifying the sharp recovery thresholds for cluster recovery under the stochastic block model. In this paper, we address the more refined question of how many vertices that will be misclassified on average. We consider the binary form of the stochastic block model, where $n$ vertices are partitioned into two clusters with edge probability $a/n$ within the first cluster, $c/n$ within the second cluster, and $b/n$ across clusters. Suppose that as $n \to \infty$, $a= b+ μ\sqrt{ b} $, $c=b+ ν\sqrt{ b} $ for two fixed constants $μ, ν$, and $b \to \infty$ with $b=n^{o(1)}$. When the cluster sizes are balanced and $μ\neq ν$, we show that the minimum fraction of misclassified vertices on average is given by $Q(\sqrt{v^*})$, where $Q(x)$ is the Q-function for standard normal, $v^*$ is the unique fixed point of $v= \frac{(μ-ν)^2}{16} + \frac{ (μ+ν)^2 }{16} \mathbb{E}[ \tanh(v+ \sqrt{v} Z)],$ and $Z$ is standard normal. Moreover, the minimum misclassified fraction on average is attained by a local algorithm, namely belief propagation, in time linear in the number of edges. Our proof techniques are based on connecting the cluster recovery problem to tree reconstruction problems, and analyzing the density evolution of belief propagation on trees with Gaussian approximations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.