Paper detail

DenseScout: Algorithm-System Co-design for Budgeted Tiny Object Selection on Edge Platforms

Deploying tiny object perception on edge platforms is challenging because practical systems must satisfy both strict compute budgets and end-to-end latency constraints. A common strategy is to first select a small number of candidate patches from a high-resolution image and then apply downstream processing only to the selected regions. However, existing detector-based frontends are not well aligned with this setting: strong offline detection accuracy does not necessarily yield effective low-budget patch prioritization, nor does it guarantee usable performance once transport and inference delays are considered. In this work, we study budgeted tiny object selection on edge platforms from a joint algorithm--system perspective. We present DenseScout, a lightweight dense-response selector with only 1.01M parameters, which directly ranks candidate patch locations from a high-resolution scene via a lightweight proxy input and is better aligned with low-budget tiny-object prioritization than detector-style frontends. To bridge offline selector quality and deployable utility, we further develop a transport-aware runtime realization on heterogeneous edge devices and adopt QoS-constrained recall, which counts a target as successfully perceived only if it is covered by the selected regions and the end-to-end processing finishes before the deadline. Experiments show that DenseScout consistently outperforms detector-based baselines in offline budgeted patch-selection evaluation, especially in low-budget regimes, while cross-platform results on RK3588 and Jetson Orin NX show that deployable performance depends jointly on selector quality and runtime realization efficiency. These results suggest that edge tiny object perception should be optimized as an algorithm--system co-design problem rather than as isolated model selection.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.