Paper detail

Delta I=1/2 Rule, epsilon'/epsilon and K -> pi nu nubar in Z'(Z) and G' Models with FCNC Quark Couplings

The experimental value for the isospin amplitude Re(A_2) in K->pi pi decays has been successfully explained within the Standard Model, both within large N approach to QCD and by QCD lattice calculations. On the other hand in both approaches the theoretical values of Re(A_0) are by at least 30% below the data so that the Delta I=1/2 rule in K->pi pi decays is not fully explained. While this deficit could be the result of present theoretical uncertainties in both approaches, it cannot be excluded that the missing piece in Re(A_0) comes from New Physics. We demonstrate that this deficit can be significantly softened by tree-level FCNC transitions mediated by a heavy colourless Z' gauge boson with particularly chosen flavour violating couplings assuring negligible NP contributions to Re(A_2) and significantly enhancing the contribution of the leading QCD penguin operator Q_6 to Re(A_0). A large fraction of the missing piece in the Delta I=1/2 rule can be explained in this manner for M_{Z'} in the reach of the LHC, while satisfying constraints from epsilon_K, epsilon'/epsilon, Delta M_K, LEP-II and the LHC. We identify quartic correlation between Z' contributions to Re(A_0), epsilon'/epsilon, epsilon_K and Delta M_K. We present correlations between epsilon'/epsilon and rare decays K->pi nu bar{nu} with and without the Delta I=1/2 rule constraint and generalize the whole analysis to Z' with colour (G') and Z with FCNC couplings. In the latter case no improvement on Re(A_0) can be achieved without destroying the agreement of the SM with the data on Re(A_2). Moreover, this scenario is very tightly constrained by epsilon'/epsilon. On the other hand in the context of the Delta I=1/2 rule G' is even more effective than Z': it provides the missing piece in Re(A_0) for M_{G'}=(3.5-4.0) TeV.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.