Paper detail

Degree of satisfiability of some special equations

A well-known theorem of Gustafson states that in a non-Abelian group the degree of satisfiability of $xy=yx$, i.e. the probability that two uniformly randomly chosen group elements $x,y$ obey the equation $xy=yx$, is no larger than $\frac{5}{8}$. The seminal work of Antolin, Martino and Ventura (arXiv:1511.07269) on generalizing the degree of satisfiability to finitely generated groups led to renewed interest in Gustafson-style properties of other equations. Positive results have recently been obtained for the 2-Engel and metabelian identities (arXiv:1809.02997). Here we show that the degree of satisfiability of the equations $xy^2=y^2x$, $xy^3=y^3x$ and $xy=yx^{-1}$ is either 1, or no larger than $1-\varepsilon$ for some positive constant $\varepsilon$. Using the Antolin-Martino-Ventura formalism, we introduce criteria to identify which equations hold in a finite index subgroup precisely if they have positive degree of satisfiability. We deduce that the equations $xy=yx^{-1}$ and $xy^2=y^2x$ do not have this property.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.