Paper detail

Defect physics, delithiation mechanism, and electronic and ionic conduction in layered lithium manganese oxide cathode materials

Layered LiMnO$_2$ and Li$_2$MnO$_3$ are of great interest for lithium-ion battery cathodes because of their high theoretical capacities. The practical application of these materials is, however, limited due to poor electrochemical performance. We herein report a comprehensive first-principles study of defect physics in LiMnO$_2$ and Li$_2$MnO$_3$ using hybrid-density functional calculations. We find that manganese antisites have low formation energies in LiMnO$_2$ and may act as nucleation sites for the formation of impurity phases. The antisites can also occur with high concentrations in Li$_2$MnO$_3$; however, unlike in LiMnO$_2$, they can be eliminated by tuning the experimental conditions during preparation. Other intrinsic point defects may also occur and have an impact on the materials' properties and functioning. An analysis of the formation of lithium vacancies indicates that lithium extraction from LiMnO$_2$ is associated with oxidation at the manganese site, resulting in the formation of manganese small hole polarons; whereas in Li$_2$MnO$_3$ the intrinsic delithiation mechanism involves oxidation at the oxygen site, leading to the formation of bound oxygen hole polarons $η_{\rm O}^{+}$. The layered oxides are found to have no or negligible bandlike carriers and they cannot be doped n- or p-type. The electronic conduction proceeds through hopping of hole and/or electron polarons; the ionic conduction occurs through lithium monovacancy and/or divacancy migration mechanisms. Since $η_{\rm O}^{+}$ is not stable in the absence of negatively charged lithium vacancies in bulk Li$_2$MnO$_3$, the electronic conduction near the start of delithiation is likely to be poor. We suggest that the electronic conduction associated with $η_{\rm O}^{+}$ and, hence, the electrochemical performance of Li$_2$MnO$_3$ can be improved through nanostructuring and/or ion substitution.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.