Paper detail

Default Bayesian analysis with global-local shrinkage priors

We provide a framework for assessing the default nature of a prior distribution using the property of regular variation, which we study for global-local shrinkage priors. In particular, we demonstrate the horseshoe priors, originally designed to handle sparsity, also possess regular variation and thus are appropriate for default Bayesian analysis. To illustrate our methodology, we solve a problem of non-informative priors due to Efron (1973), who showed standard flat non-informative priors in high-dimensional normal means model can be highly informative for nonlinear parameters of interest. We consider four such problems and show global-local shrinkage priors such as the horseshoe and horseshoe+ perform as Efron (1973) requires in each case. We find the reason for this lies in the ability of the global-local shrinkage priors to separate a low-dimensional signal embedded in high-dimensional noise, even for nonlinear functions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.