Paper detail

Deep Wave Network for Modeling Multi-Scale Physical Dynamics

Performance of deep learning models is strongly governed by architectural capacity, with width and depth as primary controls. However, in physical-science applications, models are often compared at a single fixed size or by separating accuracy and computational cost, which can be misleading since architectures exhibit different accuracy-cost scaling as width and depth vary. This issue is particularly relevant for U-Net-type encoder-decoder models, widely used for multi-scale gas, fluid, and plasma dynamics due to their ability to represent features across spatial scales. A U-Net constructs a multi-resolution representation via an encoder that progressively reduces spatial resolution, followed by a decoder that restores it for prediction. Skip connections link corresponding encoder and decoder features, preserving fine-scale information and improving optimization. In practice, U-Net width is routinely tuned, while depth is typically kept fixed (a set number of down/up-sampling stages with few convolutions per stage), limiting systematic exploration of depth for improving the accuracy-cost trade-off. We address this limitation by increasing effective depth through stacking multiple encoder-decoder "waves" in series, with skip connections both within and across waves to enable progressive cross-scale refinement. We call this architecture a Deep Wave Network (DW-Net). Training data, optimization, and schedules are kept identical across models. Instead of evaluating single configurations, we train multiple width variants of each architecture and compare accuracy vs. GPU time Pareto fronts. Across several 2D and 3D flow benchmarks, DW-Net models consistently improve the Pareto frontier over single-wave U-Nets, achieving higher accuracy at matched cost or similar accuracy at reduced cost, and reaching low-error regimes with up to 3x less training time under identical training settings.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.