Paper detail

Deep reinforcement learning with a particle dynamics environment applied to emergency evacuation of a room with obstacles

A very successful model for simulating emergency evacuation is the social-force model. At the heart of the model is the self-driven force that is applied to an agent and is directed towards the exit. However, it is not clear if the application of this force results in optimal evacuation, especially in complex environments with obstacles. Here, we develop a deep reinforcement learning algorithm in association with the social force model to train agents to find the fastest evacuation path. During training, we penalize every step of an agent in the room and give zero reward at the exit. We adopt the Dyna-Q learning approach. We first show that in the case of a room without obstacles the resulting self-driven force points directly towards the exit as in the social force model and that the median exit time intervals calculated using the two methods are not significantly different. Then, we investigate evacuation of a room with one obstacle and one exit. We show that our method produces similar results with the social force model when the obstacle is convex. However, in the case of concave obstacles, which sometimes can act as traps for agents governed purely by the social force model and prohibit complete room evacuation, our approach is clearly advantageous since it derives a policy that results in object avoidance and complete room evacuation without additional assumptions. We also study evacuation of a room with multiple exits. We show that agents are able to evacuate efficiently from the nearest exit through a shared network trained for a single agent. Finally, we test the robustness of the Dyna-Q learning approach in a complex environment with multiple exits and obstacles. Overall, we show that our model can efficiently simulate emergency evacuation in complex environments with multiple room exits and obstacles where it is difficult to obtain an intuitive rule for fast evacuation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.