Paper detail

Deep learning using a biophysical model for Robust and Accelerated Reconstruction (RoAR) of quantitative and artifact-free R2* images

Purpose: To introduce a novel deep learning method for Robust and Accelerated Reconstruction (RoAR) of quantitative and B0-inhomogeneity-corrected R2* maps from multi-gradient recalled echo (mGRE) MRI data. Methods: RoAR trains a convolutional neural network (CNN) to generate quantitative R2* maps free from field inhomogeneity artifacts by adopting a self-supervised learning strategy given (a) mGRE magnitude images, (b) the biophysical model describing mGRE signal decay, and (c) preliminary-evaluated F-function accounting for contribution of macroscopic B0 field inhomogeneities. Importantly, no ground-truth R2* images are required and F-function is only needed during RoAR training but not application. Results: We show that RoAR preserves all features of R2* maps while offering significant improvements over existing methods in computation speed (seconds vs. hours) and reduced sensitivity to noise. Even for data with SNR=5 RoAR produced R2* maps with accuracy of 22% while voxel-wise analysis accuracy was 47%. For SNR=10 the RoAR accuracy increased to 17% vs. 24% for direct voxel-wise analysis. Conclusion: RoAR is trained to recognize the macroscopic magnetic field inhomogeneities directly from the input magnitude-only mGRE data and eliminate their effect on R2* measurements. RoAR training is based on the biophysical model and does not require ground-truth R2* maps. Since RoAR utilizes signal information not just from individual voxels but also accounts for spatial patterns of the signals in the images, it reduces the sensitivity of R2* maps to the noise in the data. These features plus high computational speed provide significant benefits for the potential usage of RoAR in clinical settings.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.