Paper detail

Deep learning-based attenuation correction in the image domain for myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging

Objective: In this work, we set out to investigate the accuracy of direct attenuation correction (AC) in the image domain for the myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging (MPI-SPECT) using two residual (ResNet) and UNet deep convolutional neural networks. Methods: The MPI-SPECT 99mTc-sestamibi images of 99 participants were retrospectively examined. UNet and ResNet networks were trained using SPECT non-attenuation corrected images as input and CT-based attenuation corrected SPECT images (CT-AC) as reference. The Chang AC approach, considering a uniform attenuation coefficient within the body contour, was also implemented. Quantitative and clinical evaluation of the proposed methods were performed considering SPECT CT-AC images of 19 subjects as reference using the mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity index (SSIM) metrics, as well as relevant clinical indices such as perfusion deficit (TPD). Results: Overall, the deep learning solution exhibited good agreement with the CT-based AC, noticeably outperforming the Chang method. The ResNet and UNet models resulted in the ME (count) of ${-6.99\pm16.72}$ and ${-4.41\pm11.8}$ and SSIM of ${0.99\pm0.04}$ and ${0.98\pm0.05}$, respectively. While the Change approach led to ME and SSIM of ${25.52\pm33.98}$ and ${0.93\pm0.09}$, respectively. Similarly, the clinical evaluation revealed a mean TPD of ${12.78\pm9.22}$ and ${12.57\pm8.93}$ for the ResNet and UNet models, respectively, compared to ${12.84\pm8.63}$ obtained from the reference SPECT CT-AC images. On the other hand, the Chang approach led to a mean TPD of ${16.68\pm11.24}$. Conclusion: We evaluated two deep convolutional neural networks to estimate SPECT-AC images directly from the non-attenuation corrected images. The deep learning solutions exhibited the promising potential to generate reliable attenuation corrected SPECT images without the use of transmission scanning.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.