Paper detail

Deep-Learning Architectures for Multi-Pitch Estimation: Towards Reliable Evaluation

Extracting pitch information from music recordings is a challenging but important problem in music signal processing. Frame-wise transcription or multi-pitch estimation aims for detecting the simultaneous activity of pitches in polyphonic music recordings and has recently seen major improvements thanks to deep-learning techniques, with a variety of proposed network architectures. In this paper, we realize different architectures based on CNNs, the U-net structure, and self-attention components. We propose several modifications to these architectures including self-attention modules for skip connections, recurrent layers to replace the self-attention, and a multi-task strategy with simultaneous prediction of the degree of polyphony. We compare variants of these architectures in different sizes for multi-pitch estimation, focusing on Western classical music beyond the piano-solo scenario using the MusicNet and Schubert Winterreise datasets. Our experiments indicate that most architectures yield competitive results and that larger model variants seem to be beneficial. However, we find that these results substantially depend on randomization effects and the particular choice of the training-test split, which questions the claim of superiority for particular architectures given only small improvements. We therefore investigate the influence of dataset splits in the presence of several movements of a work cycle (cross-version evaluation) and propose a best-practice splitting strategy for MusicNet, which weakens the influence of individual test tracks and suppresses overfitting to specific works and recording conditions. A final evaluation on a mixed dataset suggests that improvements on one specific dataset do not necessarily generalize to other scenarios, thus emphasizing the need for further high-quality multi-pitch datasets in order to reliably measure progress in music transcription tasks.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.