Paper detail

Deep Deconfounded Content-based Tag Recommendation for UGC with Causal Intervention

Traditional content-based tag recommender systems directly learn the association between user-generated content (UGC) and tags based on collected UGC-tag pairs. However, since a UGC uploader simultaneously creates the UGC and selects the corresponding tags, her personal preference inevitably biases the tag selections, which prevents these recommenders from learning the causal influence of UGCs' content features on tags. In this paper, we propose a deep deconfounded content-based tag recommender system, namely, DecTag, to address the above issues. We first establish a causal graph to represent the relations among uploader, UGC, and tag, where the uploaders are identified as confounders that spuriously correlate UGC and tag selections. Specifically, to eliminate the confounding bias, causal intervention is conducted on the UGC node in the graph via backdoor adjustment, where uploaders' influence on tags leaked through backdoor paths can be eliminated for causal effect estimation. Observing that adjusting the causal graph with do-calculus requires integrating the entire uploader space, which is infeasible, we design a novel Monte Carlo (MC)-based estimator with bootstrap, which can achieve asymptotic unbiasedness provided that uploaders for the collected UGCs are i.i.d. samples from the population. In addition, the MC estimator has the intuition of substituting the biased uploaders with a hypothetical random uploader from the population in the training phase, where deconfounding can be achieved in an interpretable manner. Finally, we establish a YT-8M-Causal dataset based on the widely used YouTube-8M dataset with causal intervention and propose an evaluation strategy accordingly to unbiasedly evaluate causal tag recommenders. Extensive experiments show that DecTag is more robust to confounding bias than state-of-the-art causal recommenders.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.