Paper detail

Deconvolution with application to estimation of sampling probabilities and the Horvitz-Thompson estimator

We elaborate on a deconvolution method, used to estimate the empirical distribution of unknown parameters, as suggested recently by Efron (2013). It is applied to estimating the empirical distribution of the 'sampling probabilities' of m sampled items. The estimated empirical distribution is used to modify the Horvitz-Thompson estimator. The performance of the modified Horvitz-Thompson estimator is studied in two examples. In one example the sampling probabilities are estimated based on the number of visits until a response was obtained. The other example is based on real data from panel sampling, where in four consecutive months there are corresponding four attempts to interview each member in a panel. The sampling probabilities are estimated based on the number of successful attempts. We also discuss briefly, further applications of deconvolution, including estimation of False discovery rate.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.