Paper detail

$β$-decay of $^{61}$V and its Role in Cooling Accreted Neutron Star Crusts

The interpretation of observations of cooling neutron star crusts in quasi-persistent X-ray transients is affected by predictions of the strength of neutrino cooling via crust Urca processes. The strength of crust Urca neutrino cooling depends sensitively on the electron-capture and $β$-decay ground-state to ground-state transition strengths of neutron-rich rare isotopes. Nuclei with mass number $A=61$ are predicted to be among the most abundant in accreted crusts, and the last remaining experimentally undetermined ground-state to ground-state transition strength was the $β$-decay of $^{61}$V. This work reports the first experimental determination of this transition strength, a ground-state branching of 8.1$^{+2.2}_{-2.0} \%$, corresponding to a log $ft$ value of 5.5$^{+0.2}_{-0.2}$. This result was achieved through the measurement of the $β$-delayed $γ$ rays using the total absorption spectrometer SuN and the measurement of the $β$-delayed neutron branch using the neutron long counter system NERO at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory at Michigan State University. This method helps to mitigate the impact of the Pandemonium effect in extremely neutron-rich nuclei on experimental results. The result implies that $A=61$ nuclei do not provide the strongest cooling in accreted neutron star crusts as expected by some predictions, but that their cooling is still larger compared to most other mass numbers. Only nuclei with mass numbers 31, 33, and 55 are predicted to be cooling more strongly. However, the theoretical predictions for the transition strengths of these nuclei are not consistently accurate enough to draw conclusions on crust cooling. With the experimental approach developed in this work all relevant transitions are within reach to be studied in the future.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access23 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.