Paper detail

De-anonymizing scale-free social networks by percolation graph matching

We address the problem of social network de-anonymization when relationships between people are described by scale-free graphs. In particular, we propose a rigorous, asymptotic mathematical analysis of the network de-anonymization problem while capturing the impact of power-law node degree distribution, which is a fundamental and quite ubiquitous feature of many complex systems such as social networks. By applying bootstrap percolation and a novel graph slicing technique, we prove that large inhomogeneities in the node degree lead to a dramatic reduction of the initial set of nodes that must be known a priori (the seeds) in order to successfully identify all other users. We characterize the size of this set when seeds are selected using different criteria, and we show that their number can be as small as $n^ε$, for any small ${ε>0}$. Our results are validated through simulation experiments on a real social network graph.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.