Paper detail

DC-NAS: Divide-and-Conquer Neural Architecture Search

Most applications demand high-performance deep neural architectures costing limited resources. Neural architecture searching is a way of automatically exploring optimal deep neural networks in a given huge search space. However, all sub-networks are usually evaluated using the same criterion; that is, early stopping on a small proportion of the training dataset, which is an inaccurate and highly complex approach. In contrast to conventional methods, here we present a divide-and-conquer (DC) approach to effectively and efficiently search deep neural architectures. Given an arbitrary search space, we first extract feature representations of all sub-networks according to changes in parameters or output features of each layer, and then calculate the similarity between two different sampled networks based on the representations. Then, a k-means clustering is conducted to aggregate similar architectures into the same cluster, separately executing sub-network evaluation in each cluster. The best architecture in each cluster is later merged to obtain the optimal neural architecture. Experimental results conducted on several benchmarks illustrate that DC-NAS can overcome the inaccurate evaluation problem, achieving a $75.1\%$ top-1 accuracy on the ImageNet dataset, which is higher than that of state-of-the-art methods using the same search space.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.