Paper detail

Data Placement and Replica Selection for Improving Co-location in Distributed Environments

Increasing need for large-scale data analytics in a number of application domains has led to a dramatic rise in the number of distributed data management systems, both parallel relational databases, and systems that support alternative frameworks like MapReduce. There is thus an increasing contention on scarce data center resources like network bandwidth; further, the energy requirements for powering the computing equipment are also growing dramatically. As we show empirically, increasing the execution parallelism by spreading out data across a large number of machines may achieve the intended goal of decreasing query latencies, but in most cases, may increase the total resource and energy consumption significantly. For many analytical workloads, however, minimizing query latencies is often not critical; in such scenarios, we argue that we should instead focus on minimizing the average query span, i.e., the average number of machines that are involved in processing of a query, through colocation of data items that are frequently accessed together. In this work, we exploit the fact that most distributed environments need to use replication for fault tolerance, and we devise workload-driven replica selection and placement algorithms that attempt to minimize the average query span. We model a historical query workload trace as a hypergraph over a set of data items, and formulate and analyze the problem of replica placement by drawing connections to several well-studied graph theoretic concepts. We develop a series of algorithms to decide which data items to replicate, and where to place the replicas. We show effectiveness of our proposed approach by presenting results on a collection of synthetic and real workloads. Our experiments show that careful data placement and replication can dramatically reduce the average query spans resulting in significant reductions in the resource consumption.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.