Paper detail

Data integration in high dimension with multiple quantiles

This article deals with the analysis of high dimensional data that come from multiple sources (experiments) and thus have different possibly correlated responses, but share the same set of predictors. The measurements of the predictors may be different across experiments. We introduce a new regression approach with multiple quantiles to select those predictors that affect any of the responses at any quantile level and estimate the nonzero parameters. Our estimator is a minimizer of a penalized objective function, which aggregates the data from the different experiments. We establish model selection consistency and asymptotic normality of the estimator. In addition we present an information criterion, which can also be used for consistent model selection. Simulations and two data applications illustrate the advantages of our method, which takes the group structure induced by the predictors across experiments and quantile levels into account.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.