Paper detail

Data Dependent Convergence for Distributed Stochastic Optimization

In this dissertation we propose alternative analysis of distributed stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms that rely on spectral properties of the data covariance. As a consequence we can relate questions pertaining to speedups and convergence rates for distributed SGD to the data distribution instead of the regularity properties of the objective functions. More precisely we show that this rate depends on the spectral norm of the sample covariance matrix. An estimate of this norm can provide practitioners with guidance towards a potential gain in algorithm performance. For example many sparse datasets with low spectral norm prove to be amenable to gains in distributed settings. Towards establishing this data dependence we first study a distributed consensus-based SGD algorithm and show that the rate of convergence involves the spectral norm of the sample covariance matrix when the underlying data is assumed to be independent and identically distributed (homogenous). This dependence allows us to identify network regimes that prove to be beneficial for datasets with low sample covariance spectral norm. Existing consensus based analyses prove to be sub-optimal in the homogenous setting. Our analysis method also allows us to find data-dependent convergence rates as we limit the amount of communication. Spreading a fixed amount of data across more nodes slows convergence; in the asymptotic regime we show that adding more machines can help when minimizing twice-differentiable losses. Since the mini-batch results don't follow from the consensus results we propose a different data dependent analysis thereby providing theoretical validation for why certain datasets are more amenable to mini-batching. We also provide empirical evidence for results in this thesis.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.