Paper detail

Data-Augmentation for Graph Neural Network Learning of the Relaxed Energies of Unrelaxed Structures

Computational materials discovery has continually grown in utility over the past decade due to advances in computing power and crystal structure prediction algorithms (CSPA). However, the computational cost of the \textit{ab initio} calculations required by CSPA limits its utility to small unit cells, reducing the compositional and structural space the algorithms can explore. Past studies have bypassed many unneeded \textit{ab initio} calculations by utilizing machine learning methods to predict formation energy and determine the stability of a material. Specifically, graph neural networks display high fidelity in predicting formation energy. Traditionally graph neural networks are trained on large data sets of relaxed structures. Unfortunately, the geometries of unrelaxed candidate structures produced by CSPA often deviate from the relaxed state, which leads to poor predictions hindering the model's ability to filter energetically unfavorable prior to \textit{ab initio} evaluation. This work shows that the prediction error on relaxed structures reduces as training progresses, while the prediction error on unrelaxed structures increases, suggesting an inverse correlation between relaxed and unrelaxed structure prediction accuracy. To remedy this behavior, we propose a simple, physically motivated, computationally cheap perturbation technique that augments training data to improve predictions on unrelaxed structures dramatically. On our test set consisting of 623 Nb-Sr-H hydride structures, we found that training a crystal graph convolutional neural networks, utilizing our augmentation method, reduced the MAE of formation energy prediction by 66\% compared to training with only relaxed structures. We then show how this error reduction can accelerates CSPA by improving the model's ability to filter out energetically unfavorable structures accurately.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.