Paper detail

Data Augmentation for Enhancing EEG-based Emotion Recognition with Deep Generative Models

The data scarcity problem in emotion recognition from electroencephalography (EEG) leads to difficulty in building an affective model with high accuracy using machine learning algorithms or deep neural networks. Inspired by emerging deep generative models, we propose three methods for augmenting EEG training data to enhance the performance of emotion recognition models. Our proposed methods are based on two deep generative models, variational autoencoder (VAE) and generative adversarial network (GAN), and two data augmentation strategies. For the full usage strategy, all of the generated data are augmented to the training dataset without judging the quality of the generated data, while for partial usage, only high-quality data are selected and appended to the training dataset. These three methods are called conditional Wasserstein GAN (cWGAN), selective VAE (sVAE), and selective WGAN (sWGAN). To evaluate the effectiveness of these methods, we perform a systematic experimental study on two public EEG datasets for emotion recognition, namely, SEED and DEAP. We first generate realistic-like EEG training data in two forms: power spectral density and differential entropy. Then, we augment the original training datasets with a different number of generated realistic-like EEG data. Finally, we train support vector machines and deep neural networks with shortcut layers to build affective models using the original and augmented training datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that the augmented training datasets produced by our methods enhance the performance of EEG-based emotion recognition models and outperform the existing data augmentation methods such as conditional VAE, Gaussian noise, and rotational data augmentation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.