Paper detail

Data-Adaptive Automatic Threshold Calibration for Stability Selection

Stability selection has gained popularity as a method for enhancing the performance of variable selection algorithms while controlling false discovery rates. However, achieving these desirable properties depends on correctly specifying the stable threshold parameter, which can be challenging. An arbitrary choice of this parameter can substantially alter the set of selected variables, as the variables' selection probabilities are inherently data-dependent. To address this issue, we propose Exclusion Automatic Threshold Selection (EATS), a data-adaptive algorithm that streamlines stability selection by automating the threshold specification process. EATS initially filters out potential noise variables using an exclusion probability threshold, derived from applying stability selection to a randomly shuffled version of the dataset. Following this, EATS selects the stable threshold parameter using the elbow method, balancing the marginal utility of including additional variables against the risk of selecting superfluous variables. We evaluate our approach through an extensive simulation study, benchmarking across commonly used variable selection algorithms and static stable threshold values.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.