Paper detail

Dark Matter and $(g-2)_{μ,e}$ in radiative Dirac neutrino mass models

The origin of neutrino mass is a mystery, so is its nature, namely, whether neutrinos are Dirac or Majorana particles. On top of that, hints of large deviations of the muon and the electron anomalous magnetic moments (AMMs) are strong evidence for physics beyond the Standard Model. In this work, piecing these puzzles together, we propose a class of radiative Dirac neutrino mass models to reconcile $(g-2)_{μ,e}$ anomalies with neutrino oscillation data. In this framework, a common set of new physics (NP) states run through the loops that generate non-zero neutrino mass and, due to chiral enhancement, provide substantial NP contributions to lepton AMMs. In addition, one of the three models studied in this work offers a Dark Matter candidate automatically stabilized by the residual symmetry, whose phenomenology is non-trivially connected to the other two puzzles mentioned above. Finally, our detailed numerical analysis reveals a successful resolution to these mysteries while being consistent with all colliders and cosmological constraints.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.