Paper detail

Damage spreading transition in an opinion dynamics model

We study the damage spreading phenomena in two different ways in a opinion dynamics model introduced recently. This kinetic exchange type model is characterized by a fraction $q$ of negative interactions and shows the presence of an order-disorder transition at $q_c$. In the traditional method, two replicas of the population are considered in which the opinion of all the agents are identical initially except for a single agent. The systems are then allowed to evolve identically. In the other method, the initial opinions are identical for all agents but the two replicas are evolved independently. In both cases, a damage spreading transition occurs at $q_d$ where $q_d \approx 0.18$ in the traditional method and $q_d =0$ for the other; the damage increases with $q$ above $q_d$ and attains a constant value for $q\geq q_c$. However, the correlation between the evolved states above $q_c$ is clearly different in the two methods.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.