Paper detail

Cyclic inner functions in growth classes and applications to approximation problems

It is well-known that for any inner function $θ$ defined in the unit disk $D$ the following two conditons: $(i)$ there exists a sequence of polynomials $\{p_n\}_n$ such that $\lim_{n \to \infty} θ(z) p_n(z) = 1$ for all $z \in D$, and $(ii)$ $\sup_n \| θp_n \|_\infty < \infty$, are incompatible, i.e., cannot be satisfied simultaneously. In this note we discuss and apply a consequence of a result by Thomas Ransford, which shows that if we relax the second condition to allow for arbitrarily slow growth of the sequence $\{ θ(z) p_n(z)\}_n$ as $|z| \to 1$, then condition $(i)$ can be met. In other words, every growth class of analytic functions contains cyclic singular inner functions. We apply this observation to properties of decay of Taylor coefficients and moduli of continuity of functions in model spaces $K_θ$. In particular, we establish a variant of a result of Khavinson and Dyakonov on non-existence of functions with certain smoothness properties in $K_θ$, and we show that the classical Aleksandrov theorem on density of continuous functions in $K_θ$, and its generalization to de Branges-Rovnyak spaces $\mathcal{H}(b)$, is essentially sharp.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.