Paper detail

Cutoff for Random Walks on Upper Triangular Matrices

Consider the random Cayley graph of a finite group $G$ with respect to $k$ generators chosen uniformly at random, with $1 \ll \log k \ll \log |G|$ (ie $1 \ll k = |G|^{o(1)}$). A conjecture of Aldous and Diaconis (1985) asserts, for $k\gg\log|G|$, that the random walk on this graph exhibits cutoff. When $\log k \lesssim \log\log|G|$ (ie $k = (\log |G|)^{\mathcal O(1)}$), the only example of a non-Abelian group for which cutoff has been established is the dihedral group. We establish cutoff (as $p\to infty$) for the group of $d \times d$ unit upper triangular matrices with integer entries modulo $p$ (prime), which we denote $U_{p,d}$, for fixed $d$ or $d$ diverging sufficiently slowly. We allow $1 \ll k \lesssim \log |U_{p,d}|$ as well as $k\gg\log|U_{p,d}|$. The cutoff time is $\max\{\log_k |U_{p,d}|, \: s_0 k\}$, where $s_0$ is the time at which the entropy of the random walk on $\mathbb Z$ reaches $(\log |U_{p,d}^\mathrm{ab}|)/k$, where $U_{p,d}^\mathrm{ab} \cong \mathbb Z_p^{d-1}$ is the Abelianisation of $U_{p,d}$. When $1 \ll k \ll \log |U_{p,d}^\mathrm{ab}|$ and $d \asymp 1$, we find the limit profile. We also prove highly related results for the $d$-dimensional Heisenberg group over $\mathbb Z_p$. The Aldous--Diaconis conjecture also asserts, for $k gg\log |G|$, that the cutoff time should depend only on $k$ and $|G|$. This was verified for all Abelian groups. Our result shows that this is not the case for $U_{p,d}$: the cutoff time depends on $k$, $|U_{p,d}| = p^{d(d-1)/2}$ and $|U_{p,d}^\mathrm{ab}|=p^{d-1}$. We also show that all but $o(|U_{p,d}|)$ of the elements of $U_{p,d}$ lie at graph distance $M \pm o(M)$ from the identity, where $M$ is the minimal radius of a ball in $\mathbb Z^k$ of cardinality $|U_{p,d}^\mathrm{ab}| = p^{d-1}$. Finally, we show that the diameter is also asymptotically $M$ when $k \gtrsim \log |U_{p,d}^\textrm{ab}|$ and $d\asymp1$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.