Paper detail

Cusp in the Symmetry Energy, Speed of Sound in Neutron Stars and Emergent Pseudo-Conformal Symmetry

We review how the "cusp" predicted in the nuclear symmetry energy generated by a topology change at density $n_{1/2}\gsim 2 n_0$ can have a surprising consequence, so far unrecognized in nuclear physics and astrophysics communities, on the structure of dense compact-star matter. The topology change, when translated into nuclear EFT with "effective" QCD degrees of freedom in terms of hidden local and scale symmetries duly taken into account, predicts an EoS that is soft below and stiff above $n\gsim n_{1/2}$, involving no low-order phase transitions, and yields the macrophysical properties of neutron stars consistent -- so far with no tension -- with the astrophysical observations, including the maximum mass $ 2.0\lsim M/ M_\odot\lsim 2.2$ as well as the GW data. Furthermore it describes the interior core of the massive stars populated by baryon-charge-fractionalized quasi-fermions that are neither baryonic nor quarkonic. It is argued that the cusp "buried" in the symmetry energy resulting from strong correlations with hidden heavy degrees of freedom leads, at $n\gsim n_{1/2}$, to what we dubbed "pseudo-conformal" sound speed, $v^2_{pcs}/c^2\approx 1/3$, precociously converged from below at $n_{1/2}$. It is not strictly conformal since the trace of energy-momentum tensor is not zero even in the chiral limit. This observation with the topology change identified with the putative hadron-quark continuity, taking place at at density $\gsim 2 n_0$, implies that the quantities accurately measured at $\sim n_0$ cannot give a stringent constraint for what takes place at the core density of compact stars $\sim (3-7) n_0$. This is because the change of degrees of freedom in effective field theory is involved. We discuss the implication of this on the recent PREX-II "dilemma" in the measured skin thickness of $^{208}$Pb.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.