Paper detail

Cross-Source Supervision for Bone Infection Segmentation in Dual-Modality PET-CT

Early and accurate diagnosis and lesion localization of bone infections are crucial for clinical treatment. PET-CT integrates anatomical information from CT with metabolic information from PET, making it an important imaging modality for diagnosing bone infections. However, accurate lesion segmentation remains challenging due to indistinct lesion boundaries and inconsistencies in annotations generated by different experts or automated systems. In this work, we investigate multimodal segmentation of bone infections under annotation discrepancy. We develop a bimodal end-to-end segmentation framework that integrates PET metabolic signals and CT bone-window anatomy through an early-fusion multimodal representation.To mitigate performance inflation caused by inter-slice correlation in small datasets, this study discards traditional two-dimensional evaluation methods and implements a rigorous patient-level 3D volumetric evaluation and cross-validation. Furthermore, instead of forcing a singular consensus, we propose a decoupled dual-source learning framework where parallel models are trained on independent expert annotations driven by high-sensitivity and high-specificity clinical intents. Experimental results objectively report performance variations at the patient level (Mean + SD and Mean - SD), demonstrating the effectiveness of multimodal PET-CT fusion. The cross-evaluation matrix quantitatively reveals how models successfully internalize distinct expert diagnostic philosophies, providing a robust, diversity-preserving paradigm for clinical AI deployment in bone infection segmentation.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.