Paper detail

Critical line in undirected Kauffman boolean networks - the role of percolation

We show that to correctly describe the position of the critical line in the Kauffman random boolean networks one must take into account percolation phenomena underlying the process of damage spreading. For this reason, since the issue of percolation transition is much simpler in random undirected networks, than in the directed ones, we study the Kauffman model in undirected networks. We derive the mean field formula for the critical line in the giant component of these networks, and show that the critical line characterizing the whole network results from the fact that the ordered behavior of small clusters shields the chaotic behavior of the giant component. We also show a possible attitude towards the analytical description of the shielding effect. The theoretical derivations given in this paper quite tally with numerical simulations done for classical random graphs.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.