Paper detail

Critical charge fluctuations in a pseudogap Anderson model

The Anderson impurity model with a density of states $ρ(\varepsilon) \propto |\varepsilon|^r$ containing a power-law pseudogap centered on the Fermi energy ($\varepsilon = 0$) features for $0<r<1$ a Kondo-destruction quantum critical point (QCP) separating Kondo-screened and local-moment phases. The observation of mixed valency in quantum critical $β$-YbAlB$_4$ has prompted study of this model away from particle-hole symmetry. The critical spin response associated with all Kondo destruction QCPs has been shown to be accompanied, for $r=0.6$ and noninteger occupation of the impurity site, by a divergence of the local charge susceptibility on both sides of the QCP. In this work, we use the numerical renormalization-group method to characterize the Kondo-destruction charge response using five critical exponents, which are found to assume nontrivial values only for $0.55\lesssim r < 1$. For $0 < r \lesssim 0.55$, by contrast, the local charge susceptibility shows no divergence at the QCP, but rather exhibits nonanalytic corrections to a regular leading behavior. Both the charge critical exponents and the previously obtained spin critical exponents satisfy a set of scaling relations derived from an ansatz for the free energy near the QCP. These critical exponents can all be expressed in terms of just two underlying exponents: the correlation-length exponent $ν(r)$ and the gap exponent $Δ(r)$. The ansatz predicts a divergent local charge susceptibility for $ν<2$, which coincides closely with the observed range $0.55\lesssim r<1$. Many of these results are argued to generalize to interacting QCPs that have been found in other quantum impurity models.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.