Paper detail

Critical behavior of the Ashkin-Teller model with a line defect: a Montecarlo study

We study magnetic critical behavior in the Ashkin-Teller model with an asymmetric defect line. This system is represented by two Ising lattices of spins $σ$ and $τ$ interacting through a four-spin coupling $ε$. In addition, the couplings between $σ$-spins are modified along a particular line, whereas couplings between $τ$-spins are kept unaltered. This problem has been previously considered by means of analytical field-theoretical methods and by numerical techniques, with contradictory results. For $ε> 0$ field-theoretical calculations give a magnetic critical exponent corresponding to $σ$-spins which depends on the defect strength only (it is independent of $ε$), while $τ$-spins magnetization decay with the universal Ising value $1/8$. On the contrary, numerical computations based on density matrix renormalization (DMRG) give, for $ε> 0$ similar scaling behaviors for $σ$ and $τ$ spins, which depend on both $ε$ and defect intensity. In this paper we revisit the problem by performing a direct Montecarlo simulation. Our results are in well agreement with DMRG computations. We also discuss some possible sources for the disagreement between numerical and analytical results.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.