Paper detail

CREW: Computation Reuse and Efficient Weight Storage for Hardware-accelerated MLPs and RNNs

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have achieved tremendous success for cognitive applications. The core operation in a DNN is the dot product between quantized inputs and weights. Prior works exploit the weight/input repetition that arises due to quantization to avoid redundant computations in Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). However, in this paper we show that their effectiveness is severely limited when applied to Fully-Connected (FC) layers, which are commonly used in state-of-the-art DNNs, as it is the case of modern Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Transformer models. To improve energy-efficiency of FC computation we present CREW, a hardware accelerator that implements Computation Reuse and an Efficient Weight Storage mechanism to exploit the large number of repeated weights in FC layers. CREW first performs the multiplications of the unique weights by their respective inputs and stores the results in an on-chip buffer. The storage requirements are modest due to the small number of unique weights and the relatively small size of the input compared to convolutional layers. Next, CREW computes each output by fetching and adding its required products. To this end, each weight is replaced offline by an index in the buffer of unique products. Indices are typically smaller than the quantized weights, since the number of unique weights for each input tends to be much lower than the range of quantized weights, which reduces storage and memory bandwidth requirements. Overall, CREW greatly reduces the number of multiplications and provides significant savings in model memory footprint and memory bandwidth usage. We evaluate CREW on a diverse set of modern DNNs. On average, CREW provides 2.61x speedup and 2.42x energy savings over a TPU-like accelerator. Compared to UCNN, a state-of-art computation reuse technique, CREW achieves 2.10x speedup and 2.08x energy savings on average.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.